🏠

This is a hand-edited transcription produced from Scans by Bayerische Staatsbibliothek using OCRmyPDF and translated with GPT4 via ChatGPT

CHAPTER TWENTY-SEVEN

The universal advantages that the Fencer will have, both for defense and offense, if they scientifically use the concept of our Fortress.

Although with the universality with which we have exemplified the idea of our Fortress, it seems we could avoid discussing it further, referring, as we have said, to the individual tactics; but as our aim is to facilitate the understanding and use of this science, and that of our Fortress, and to provide knowledge of all the advantages that the Fencer can have in its use, we have not wanted to avoid explaining what we have outlined, that the Fencer will not only be able to form their cylinder with a geometric foot in diameter, which is necessary for their defense; but it can be given two feet more or less, as best suited, a common possibility to both combatants, and to be able to affirm themselves in profile, and half profile, and squarely, and that from the obtuse angle plane, from the primary vertical plane, and from other planes and angles, the opponent, on one side or the other, can not only form their thrusting tactics, which is what has been exemplified in the previous cases; but also all the other circular and semicircular tactics of their possibility, and it is convenient for the Fencer to know in generality how to defend against them with safety; and so we suppose for a more extensive exposition of this doctrine that the Fencer be affirmed squarely, in which posture they will give the greatest disposition to be offended by their opponent, now that they are affirmed in profile, or in any other manner.

In this supposition, we give that the Fencer be affirmed squarely, and the opponent in profile, which is a posture chosen against the square to form tactics.

For the Fencer to have a defense in any event, and in the greatest disposition possible to be attacked, we give that their cylinder be two feet in diameter, so that with their Sword they can place their opponent’s in the vertical planes of their defense, tangent to their cylinder of two feet in diameter, which is double the diameter we have given in the preceding cases. This way, with their Sword, they can place their opponent’s in the vertical planes of their defense, tangent to their cylinder, on both the right and left sides, and to avoid multiplying calculations by the rules we have used.

We say, assuming that the diameter of the cylinder is double what we said in the cases that have been demonstrated; it follows that the amounts of movements that the Fencer will have to make with their Sword to put the opponent’s on one side and the other in the two vertical planes of their defense, will be double; and so in the first case, three divisions were considered in the Fencer’s Sword at point 1. 2. and 3. and it was supposed that the opponent wanted to give their compass of two feet and a quarter, to offend the Fencer with a thrust through each of these three divisions, the amount of movement that in each of them the Fencer had to make with their Sword in the opponent’s, to put it on one side and the other in the surface of their cylinder, and in the two vertical planes of their defense; and it was calculated that at point 1, a movement of about three fingers was to be made; and at number 2, three fingers and a half; and at number 3, four fingers and an eighth: and so if found squarely, the movements that are made at point 1 will be about six fingers less, and at number 2, seven fingers, and at number 3, eight and a third.

With this light, and that which has already been given in the other cases, it will be possible, in whichever one is wanted to be supposed, to examine the advantages that the Fencer will have, because it would be very cumbersome if we stopped to do it in each proposition; assuming that to offend can only be done by a straight or curved line, as will be seen in the course of this work.

Because our intention is for the Fencer to act with as much perfection as possible, and it is not doubtful that the smaller the dispositions given with their movements, and the smaller the amount they make, the more perfectly they will act, and that being affirmed in an obtuse angle with the common section of their Swords at point G, as was supposed in the aforementioned, not only can they try to hit the Fencer with a thrust; but they can form a vertical or diagonal cut, and reverse of both species.

We say that they can defend themselves from all these species of wounds, by putting the center of the guard of their Sword four fingers and a third away from the primary vertical plane to their left side, which with another four that has the semidiameter of the guard on the same side, will be eight fingers and a third, which is the necessary amount to be defended by that side, and for the opponent’s Sword to be placed in the vertical plane of their defense on the same side.

At the same time that this movement is made with the guard, they will necessarily make another with their Sword on their right side, with the attention that the Fencer must have, that the quillons of their guard are in an oblique plane, and that they virtually occupy the diagonal line of the square, which is considered in the opponent’s face from the extremity of the left eye’s eyebrow to their right side of the beard, and being in this position their guard, and Sword, they will be defended from all species of wounds that the opponent wants to execute on the face, and head of vertical, and diagonal cut.

To defend themselves from the same species of wounds, the Fencer can put their Sword in such a way, that it corresponds to the other diagonal line of the said square from the extremity of the right eyebrow of the opponent to their left side of the beard, moving to their right side four fingers and a third the center of the quillons of their guard, in the way that has been advised for the cuts because with both positions they will cut the planes that their opponent will have to occupy, to enter their fortress, and offend them.

It is given as a general rule, that from whichever plane, and Angle, that wants to form these species of circular wounds to execute them on the face, and head, the Fencer will be defended in the same way by making the same defenses.

The advantages that the Fencer will have over their opponent are so evident and considerable, that they excuse us from the embarrassment of calculating them, assuming that with four fingers and a third of another, that they make a movement, from the primary vertical plane to their right or left side, they will defend themselves from the circles that their opponent forms to execute their cuts, and reverses vertical, and diagonal of free or subject cause, sometimes with the whole arm, and Sword, and others with the center of the elbow, or wrist; and as the movements of these circles are irregular, because it is in the will of the opponent to make them larger or smaller, it cannot be adjusted, the Fencer will always have very known advantages, considering that the opponent, for their formation, will have to make the entire Pyramids, or most of them, and the Fencer by making a small portion of theirs of four fingers and a third, will be defended.

Objection

It might be said that while the Fencer is defending against vertical and diagonal cuts and reverses in the manner described, the opponent could abandon executing these on the head and face, due to a lack of opportunity, and instead lower their sword to thrust. In this case, the guidelines we have provided may not be beneficial.

Response

In presenting a science, it is appropriate to discuss its possibilities and extent, ensuring that the principles are validated in the propositions, as seen in the preceding examples. This approach better informs the understanding of its universality.

Even in the aforementioned cases, the Fencer would have the possibility to prevent what the objection covers by swiftly lowering their Sword to an acute angle and moving it from one side to the other, thus blocking the planes that the opponent intends to occupy with their sword to attack.

However, to ensure that our Fencer does not act hastily or create an opportunity for the opponent to believe they can successfully attack, we want to provide a universal method for the Fencer to defend against vertical and diagonal cuts and reverses, as well as half-cuts and half-reverses that the opponent may attempt to execute on their head and face, both from the right and left sides. This method also applies to defending against cuts and reverses, half-cuts and half-reverses typically aimed at the arm; and against horizontal cuts and reverses, and half-cuts and half-reverses of the same types, which encompass all the wounds that can possibly be inflicted by a person.

The Fencer will achieve this universal defense even if they are in a squared stance, as mentioned in the previous proposition, which offers the greatest opportunity for the opponent to attack. They should position their arm so that the guard of their sword at the top corresponds to the base of the nose, which is where the vertical plane intersects, creating a diametrical line passing through the forehead, nose, and chest. The tip of the upper quillon should vertically align with the start of the hairline, and the sword, without changing this arm and guard position, should be lowered to an acute angle, creating a semi-right angle with the upper horizontal plane, which we imagine when the Fencer is in a right angle stance, both vertically and horizontally. Even in this square stance, the arm and sword of the Fencer will create the same semi-right angle with their sword, because in all upper and lower planes, which are parallel to it, they will invariably be in a semi-right angle position.

With the Fencer thus affirmed with their arm and guard, which constitutes the principal Pyramid they can form for their defense, they will defend themselves against all vertical and diagonal cuts, reverses, half-cuts, and half-reverses that the opponent might execute on the face and head from both the right and left sides.

The Pyramid formed by their Sword, centered at their wrist, and particularly the Pyramid imagined within it at its greatest degrees of force, will defend them from the cuts, reverses, half-cuts, and half-reverses aimed at the arm.

They will also be defended from horizontal cuts and reverses, as well as thrusts aimed at them from any of the three Angles: with the Pyramids of the Sword, those thrown from the right angle downwards; and with the guard, those directed from the right angle upwards.

When the opponent attempts to lower their sword to strike with circular or semicircular wounds, or thrusts at the legs or feet, from either side, the Fencer can, for greater safety, lower their arm and guard as necessary. This will also lower the sword more towards the acute angle, enabling it with greater degrees of force to position the opponent’s sword within any of the two vertical planes of their defense, tangential on either side to their cylinder. In this figure, we give the cylinder a diameter of two feet, although one foot is sufficient for defense, as has been demonstrated.

The method the Fencer should use to avoid all these straight, circular, and semicircular wounds will be without disrupting the posture of the Pyramid of their defense formed by the arm and guard. With this Pyramid, they will impede the execution of vertical and diagonal cuts, half-cuts, and half-reverses directed at the face and head.

With their sword in the same position at the acute angle, if these types of wounds are aimed at the Pyramid, which we imagine at the highest degrees of the sword’s strength, the Fencer can position their opponent’s sword within either of the two defense planes with this Pyramid. And if the strikes are aimed, as mentioned, at the guard, the Fencer can, for greater defense, make a small movement, to either side, of a finger and a half or two, to achieve greater defense.

To further detail this understanding, the Fencer can make this small movement on their right side to defend against vertical and diagonal reverses and half-reverses, maintaining on this side the same precepts that have been given for the left side against vertical and diagonal cuts, half-cuts, and half-reverses.

They will also remain defended, exercising the same diligence, on both sides, in the Pyramid at the highest degrees of their strength, from cuts, reverses, half-cuts, and half-reverses that are typically aimed at the arm, without altering their Pyramid or guard.

The Fencer will also defend against thrusts from both sides, those coming from below the right angle, because if they end up above the guard or its sides, it will be sufficient to defend against them.

Moreover, as previously noted, if the opponent lowers their sword significantly, intending to strike with a thrust or circular or semicircular wounds on the legs or feet, the Fencer should lower their arm and guard towards the acute angle, to more closely align with the posture of their sword, enabling them to more forcefully position the opponent’s sword on both sides within the vertical planes of their defense.

Since the opponent can lower their sword to a greater or lesser extent towards the acute angle, and this cannot be precisely regulated, it is up to the Fencer to lower their arm and sword only as much as necessary, as required by the positions chosen by their opponent.

Because all this doctrine boils down to the demonstrations we have made in the previous cases and figures, simply with regard to positioning the opponent’s sword on the sides of the Fencer’s defense bastion, both in the external polygon and the internal one, where the vertical planes of the Fencer’s defense will always be. By following the same principles, the Fencer will be defended as if the sides of the bastion and the vertical planes they create were made of steel or some other dense material. This is because the Fencer, through the use of their arm, guard, and sword (which are dense materials), can achieve this easily and with minimal movement, as has been demonstrated. Since this has been done, it is not necessary to repeat it, nor to examine again the advantages the Fencer has over their opponent, as they remain the same in these cases as in the previous ones, without any difference. For greater clarity, we have chosen to exemplify this universality across all types of wounds, to fully illustrate the concept of our Fortress.

Thus, we have shown how universal this Fortress is, assuming that the Fencer waits for their opponent, ready to counter any and all possible attacks, and the great advantages this provides. However, these and even greater advantages will be more individually and clearly recognized in the tactics through the use of their compasses, maintaining the four universal principles in the formation and execution of these tactics, principles that underlie all operations of this science.

In these operations, it will be recognized that in the same ways we have mentioned that the Fencer will have for defending themselves in their Fortress, most often they will be in a position to immediately offend their opponent, if they attempt to strike without recognizing the Fencer’s defense. Indeed, some attacks will necessarily encounter the guard of their Sword, and others will meet the Pyramid we have imagined in its strongest degrees of force. In this case, the Fencer will not only be positioned to offend their opponent after having placed the opponent’s sword in one of the two vertical planes of their defense, but will also have control over it to include it within their Pyramid, to strike the opponent in the nearest part, according to the disposition given to them.

If the opponent lowers their Sword to an acute angle to attack the Fencer’s legs or feet, the Fencer, for greater security, after having followed the principle of placing it along with their own in one of the two vertical planes of their defense, can return to the right angle, either by giving a compass or without it. This will force the opponent to raise their Sword to the same plane, and then the Fencer can form the tactics that are most immediate.

To demonstrate that the concept of our Fortress, however it is considered, has solid foundations that support its reality in its effects, although in what we have demonstrated, and particularly in the chapter that deals with the force distribution, which we used to examine the strong and weak points of the Sword, in order to provide knowledge of the advantages and disadvantages in its degrees of lesser and greater force; it is verified that the Fencer has advantages in the brevity of their actions, arising from the perfection of their body postures, arm, guard, and Sword. This necessarily requires the opponent, if they wish to attack, to make longer movements than what the Fencer needs to do for their defense.

We say, for the greater satisfaction of the Fencer, and the credibility of the idea of our Fortress, that when we assume that the Fencer moves in their actions at the same times as their opponent does, and that the movements in terms of amounts are equal; still, the Fencer, due to the perfection of their postures, will always compel their opponent, if they wish to attack with circular and semicircular tactics, or with thrusts, to always pass the weaker part of their Sword through the stronger degrees of force of the Fencer’s, or over the guard, or its sides, as has been demonstrated. This means that not only will the Fencer have the advantage of placing their Sword in one of the vertical planes of their defense, but also to immediately attack, making use of the greater degrees of their force, occupying the plane that corresponds to their posture, excluding the opponent’s Sword from being able to attack; and if appropriate, they can include it in one of their Pyramids, or a portion of them, by virtue of their greater power, as the occasions demand, to attack and remain defended.

These advantages of such consideration, as is the ability of the Fencer to scientifically position themselves, becoming master of their opponent’s sword every time the opponent attempts to attack, either by excluding or including it according to their goals, due to their greater power, are among the greatest excellences and advantages that this science can produce, being little or not at all subject to chance, due to the very brief movements with which the Fencer can achieve their defense and offense against their opponent.

These warnings are understood if the opponent forms their tactics without paying attention to the perfection of the Fencer’s positions and their defense; but if the opponent is also knowledgeable and uses the idea of our Fortress with the requirements that are needed at the time of forming them, then it will come down to a contest between the two combatants, and only the one who becomes careless among the two will be defeated, because this science is common to all, and its effects, when following its rules and precepts, are universal.