From the Holy Scriptures, the origin and nobility of the Sword can be inferred, but as it does not pertain to my faculty, its omission is necessary. Among the Gentiles, their Gods were adorned with a Sword, a custom prevailing especially among the Lacedaemonians. Among the Romans, the act of girding oneself with a Sword was so esteemed that despite the military belt being a honorable insignia for the Soldier, it was not permitted in ancient Rome, except when they were actually going to war, signifying that they were to act with the Sword, from which originated the privilege, and it being solemn for the honor of the Sword, calling it a Military testament, as Aulus Gellius reports; lending the Sword the prerogative to the belt, or baldrick, from which it hangs, girded by the Soldier: Converting the terms of girdle, or military readiness, committing the synecdoche figure, and all military insignia, honorable by the Sword.
From which in the Judges, as noted by Pedro Gregorio, it is said that the girdle is because it grants them the faculty of jurisdiction, in which greater and lesser girdles are considered, for the greater or lesser power of the Sword, from which resulted the proverb, or term: Exercise, judges, in great girdles. And from such high considerations, Lampridius ponders the sentence of Alexander Caesar, who said. Never will you sell the honor of the right of the Sword, because he who buys, sells.
Dion Cassius writes of Octavius Caesar, that for the greater honor of the Provincial Praetors (corresponding to the Governors) he granted them, while exercising such preeminent Offices, to wear military attire and gird themselves with a Sword, representing in it the entire jurisdiction: and to the Proconsuls, and Prefects, and the others, who had limited jurisdiction, they were not allowed to gird themselves with a Sword, nor wear military attire. Giphilinus, in confirmation of the great prerogative of the Sword, noted against Parthenius, that being in the Chamber of Domitian (who granted him the honor of girding himself with a Sword) he treacherously killed the same Prince who had allowed it, thus multiplying the atrocious crime.
Herodian relates of Emperor Severus that when asked: What was the greatest honor Paucianus, Prefect of the Roman Courts, enjoyed? He replied that it was to continually carry a Sword at his side, as it was the insignia of the Supreme Dignity. Tritemius writes of Besançon, King of the Sicambri and later of France, that great deed against his own son Sedamo, because having promulgated the laws of Chivalry (which he observed rigorously) and Sedamo being accused and convicted of committing adultery, the King drew his Sword, and with his own hand, to give him the most honorable death possible, cut off his head, saying: It is not I, but the law that takes your life. For this action, he was called the Just, as he did not fail in legal rigor, nor allowed the executioner to carry out the punishment, nor was it done with a less noble instrument than the very same Royal Sword. The reason and antiquity of the ceremony of auguring and entering into the greatest applause the Kings and Sovereign Princes with the naked Sword before them, carried by a great personage, I will touch upon.
Bautista Ignacio argues that the practice of Kings and Sovereign Princes carrying before them the Ense (which signifies Sword, or Royal Rapier) unsheathed, symbolizes the increase of supreme power, which does not need the sanction of others for the effective use of high jurisdiction. To this point, it’s noted that the Duke of Venice, although carrying a sword before him representing the supreme jurisdiction of the Republic he governs, does not however have it unsheathed, but instead sheathed in a golden scabbard; signifying that he does not punish hastily on his own, but with the mature counsel of the Senators. In place of a sword, the associated Consuls carried before them
From this, Pedro Gregorio adds that the Sword and the Safe preceded the Kings, signifying that the highest power of jurisdiction lies within themselves, without associates. Thus, Romulus displayed before him twelve Lictors, who preceded him in the manner of the Etruscans, because twelve Peoples elected the Kings, and for each one gave to the King a Lictor, a royal insignia that he could wield the power of his Sword in each jurisdiction, in which Titus Livius and Dionysius of Halicarnassus agree.
And even earlier than the Romans, among the Persians and Greeks, the Sword signified supreme and royal power, as Quintus Curtius notes. The Chaldeans (a rank among the Persians equivalent to the Egyptian Priests) seeing that Darius at the beginning of his empire abandoned the form of the Persian sword and imitated the Greek one, prophesied that Darius’ empire would pass to the Greeks, whose style of sword he had chosen. Such must be its importance, so esteemed it is in the common consent of people, Princes, Kings, and Monarchs, that in all political nations, and at all times, the Sword has been, and is, the most noble, most distinguished, and most considered military and political instrument.
Suetonius Tranquillus in the augury of Aulus Vitellius recounts that upon receiving him as Emperor, the military people, divided into troops and occupying the most important posts, unsheathed their swords and acclaimed him equal to Mars, and Julius Caesar: and Vitellius greeted them with great demonstrations, because the Sword is the insignia of supreme power, jurisdiction, and dominion in offense and defense.
Carlos Sigonio, describing the augury of Julian Augustus, says that having been acclaimed Emperor by the military, following the death of Constantius, he made an eloquent prayer to those in his retinue. As a demonstration of their loyalty to him to the last moment, they congratulated him with their shields embraced and their swords unsheathed, placing the edges on their necks. In imitation of this, the Rectors and Princes present at the act did the same as a sign of obedience and loyalty to the Imperial dignity.
This action is very ancient in the Church, as Hector Boecio notes, referring to the example of William, King of Scotland, to whom the Pope sent the sacred Sword in the year 1202, with a sheath adorned with gold and precious stones, and it was sent with a Legate. The same favor was done for Lord Juan of Austria by Pope Pius V, as a symbol of the naval victory he achieved with a significantly smaller fleet against the numerous Turkish one.
Not only in the auguries and honors of Emperors, Monarchs, Kings, and supreme Princes is the superior dignity displayed with the Sword, but it is also used to bestow the investitures of the highest titles, offices, and honors, as Ammonius, Godfrey of Viterbo, and others relate. Pedro Gregorio, by the authority of Otto Frisingensis, notes as a general rule that the symbol of the tradition of every Feud is the Sword, or the Standard, with such distinction that the investiture of the Kingdoms is given by the Sword: and thus, when the Pope solemnly gives the investiture of King, before the Gospel, the blessed Sword, which is on the Altar, he himself girds it on the King, as a symbol of the defense of the Church, and the punishment of wrongdoers.
In Spain, the investiture of Admiral is given, according to the laws and ancient laws, with the Sword, Ring, and Standard, as well as to the Vassal, and the Leader, and of the Rich Men was their insignia Sword, Banner, and Cauldrons granting them maintenance, as found in our laws, laws, and ancient Writers.
The knighting in all political Nations is with the Sword, which was watched over with the other arms; and in Castile, and Leon in antiquity the Knight was given a blow to the neck, and he gripped his Sword, with the demonstration of drawing it against the one who knighted him, in whose respect he contained himself; but now only the blows with the Knight’s own Sword are used, which is taken from him by the one who arms him; and once the ceremony is done, it is returned to the sheath.
The Order of Santiago is named after the Sword, not so much for the qualified title, nor for the form of the Red insignia they wear on their chest, but for a special dignity and acknowledgment of the Military Institute’s obligations. In this regard, it is worth remembering that the Templars, among the constitutions of their Knighthood (highly esteemed during their time), the primary ones were to die for Christ, be the first to take up arms against Infidels, not to turn their backs having drawn the Sword, nor return to their quarters without their Captain. And if they were to be captured, they would offer no other ransom than their belt and Sword. They observed this precept so strictly that when Saladin captured a nephew of the Master, asking for more ransom than the belt and Sword, the Master preferred him to die in captivity rather than give more ransom than the belt and Sword, in accordance with his Templar Knight status, as related by John Villembrochio Dantiſcano.
The Teutonic Knights, a chivalric order, were known as Gladiators, because of their sword and the skill they professed with it, as Mnuster recounts. In conclusion, to highlight victories, it is common in Scripture to qualify them with the term, “ln ore gladij,” which is the same as “in the wake of the sword”; in Spanish it corresponds in the same sense to say: “He entered the strength with a sword in hand,” which means the same as by force of arms. By the way, it is worth pondering that in all times, in all nations, and in all symbols and paintings, the sword is, and has been, in the shape of a cross, which its guard has required, and not without great mystery, which is not of this subject.
Demosthenes, the father of the orator, was nicknamed “Makeropio”, derived from “Makera”, which in Greek is the same as “Sword”, because he had a large workshop, where very fine swords were crafted, having for its manufacture expert officials and servants, as Plutarch narrates. Suidas says that the Romans in the second Punic war, imitating the Iberian Spaniards, used swords with a point and edge, which they made for both hands.
Diodorus Siculus notes that the Celtiberian Spaniards, to manufacture swords and other weapons, stopped the iron (according to their ancient custom) making it into sheets, and hiding them in the ground, where the weaker parts were consumed over time, and from the most purified they made very fine swords, and from the less pure the other pieces of armor, so the swords came out so strong that no shield, helmet, or loriga could resist them. And Suidas notes that although the Romans in the war of Hannibal, reduced to a better measure, and form the swords, leaving those they used in old times, imitating the Spaniards; however, they did not achieve the purification of the iron, nor the goodness, nor the art in the tempering, and manufacture, in which the Spaniards exceedingly surpassed the other Nations. It is therefore recognized that in the manufacture, in the measure, in the perfection, and in the skill, nobody equaled the Spaniards, because the weapon sword is more ancient, and more proper to Spain and of greater esteem, and dignity, than in the other Kingdoms, and Provinces.
From all this it is concluded, that Sword is named with different voices (according to various languages) and it is the instrument, and weapon of the highest dignity, of the highest nobility, of the highest symbol, and of the highest esteem. Then its science, and its exercise should be speculated, known, and exercised by every Prince, by every noble, by every Soldier, and by every man of reputation, who girds a sword, in peace, or in war.